-
Website
http://www.technovia.co.uk/ -
Original page
http://www.technovia.co.uk/2008/03/sarah-lacy-and-the-cult-of-continuous-partial-attention.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Christopher Phin
8 comments · 4 points
-
kennyhemphill
4 comments · 1 points
-
Phil Glockner
2 comments · 79 points
-
Michael Walsh
12 comments · 1 points
-
Scobleizer
3 comments · 196 points
-
-
Popular Threads
That having been said, I believe that using liveblogging/livetweeting to plan when to raise your hands en masse, or to cough en masse, or whatever, is in my view another thing entirely.
Laptops, cellphones, PDAs, pagers. How many years do you have to go back before the technology doesn't exist? Quite a few years.
I know of meetings where the bleeps and blips of Palms was going on because two people with them kept exchanging notes back and forth. Who knows if any of those notes were even about the meeting itself?
What exactly is the problem? Was it the fact that people were commenting about things that were going on (which evidently they were paying attention, because they were talking about the meeting itself, not the turmoil in Tibet or whatever the news of the day was)? Or was it the fact that the meeting/interview was just wretched?
Sarah Lacy can complain all she wants, but if it was a bad interview, she's the one to blame. People are rude. That's a fact that's been a fact even before technology.
I just hope that Ms. Lacy has learned something of the situation, instead of just crying that it isn't fair. Life in general isn't fair.